Anachronistic Attitude

TAQLID AND IJTIHAD This highlights that a peaceful approach yields results far more effectively than a violent one. Despite such clear guidance on peaceful methods in the Quran and Sunnah, modern Muslim leaders and intellectuals, due to their imitative mindset, have failed to recognize these teachings. Instead, they have persistently pursued violent approaches, mistakenly perceiving them as acts of sacrifice and martyrdom. This adherence to an outdated mindset has caused immense setbacks for Muslims in the modern era while providing no tangible benefits. For example, had the Arabs of Palestine embraced this principle after 1948, they might have avoided a destructive armed struggle. By adopting peaceful methods and utilizing the opportunities available in the modern age, they could have achieved a position of influence in Palestine akin to the Jewish community’s status in America—acquired through similar peaceful approaches. Similarly, if the Muslims of Kashmir had understood this principle, they would not have resorted to the culture of guns and bombs that have come to define their struggle. Instead, they could have cultivated a culture of peace, harnessing modern opportunities within a framework of non-violence. This approach could have earned them a position of respect and influence not only in Kashmir but throughout India—a far more beneficial outcome than the so-called ‘Azad Kashmir.’