Reviving Ijtihad

His words were certainly provocative. Had I reacted with anger, I might have simply rebuked him and walked away. But, by the grace of God, I maintained my composure. This allowed me to think constructively and respond calmly. I said, “The same difference that existed in history before Muhammad.” (In other words, history would lack exactly what it did before his advent.) This criticism compelled me to reflect on an aspect of the Prophet’s life I had not previously considered. The observation led me to realize that all modern scientific and cultural advancements emerged after the Prophet’s advent. This insight inspired a formal study, culminating in my book, “Islam: The Creator of the Modern Age.” This experience demonstrates that when one approaches criticism with composure and an open mind, it can be a profound source of growth and discovery. True Standards and False Standards One significant drawback of an imitative mindset is its inability to recognize truth on its own merits. Instead, individuals with such a mindset identify truth through their revered figures, making these figures their primary point of reference. Whatever their assumed elders declare as truth is accepted without question. Conversely, when someone outside their circle of reverence presents a matter—regardless of the strength of evidence—they remain unwilling to accept it. This stems from their lack of their ability to discern and embrace truth based solely on evidence. This has been the single most significant reason for the rejection of prophets in every era. A prophet would