Correspondence with Maulana Abul Lais Islahi Nadwi

perspective without reason. Therefore, this condition will likely never be met, and he may never respond. Therefore, no effort was made to answer my questions. Instead, it was said about me, “Maulana Sadruddin has given complete answers to everything, but he insists on his view. Who can make such a person understand? What’s the point of further discussion in this situation?” I acknowledge that some errors were pointed out in the brief commentary I submitted to you, but those “errors” are so trivial that I am surprised they were even mentioned. For example, you may recall when you visited Rampur on September 6, 1962, and we discussed my issue in the office of the head of the institution. Besides yourself, Maulana Sadruddin, Afzal Hussain Khan, Abdul Hai, Urooj Qadri, and Jalaluddin Ansar Sahib. were also present. I insisted on receiving feedback on my response, yet neither you nor Maulana Sadruddin engaged with it until the end. However, during the discussion, Maulana Sadruddin remarked, “You’ve made such a major referencing error in your response that…” Hearing this, I felt alarmed, thinking I had made a significant error. But despite my inquiries, he did not clarify, nor did anyone feel the need to ask him to explain. A few days later, when I visited his office and asked about that, I discovered that the referencing error was merely that I had omitted the