Second Phase: Informal Conversation

DISCUSSION AND CORRESPONDENCE “Previously, from our brief conversations, I understood that your objection was that Maulana Maududi exaggerated in his interpretation of Islam, and I agreed with you on that. But after reading your writing, I realized that your objection is that he has fundamentally misinterpreted Islam. Now, I strongly disagree with you.” He added that a detailed discussion would follow. However, despite repeated reminders in subsequent meetings, a detailed discussion never took place, nor did he address any specific point to refute it. My last meeting with him on this matter was on October 17, 1962, in Azamgarh, where he again reviewed my writing in detail. After reading it, when I asked for his comments, he remained silent, only stating, “I disagree with your perspective.” 5. Another senior figure, actively engaged in Jamaate-Islami’s literary efforts, read my written memo and responded with a written opinion. His complete written response is as follows: Respected Brother, Assalamu Alaykum wa Rahmatullahi After reading your article, two prayers arose in my heart—one for myself and one for you. O Allah, my Lord, if I have not understood the religion, you have sent, correctly, grant