If We Gain, Why Not

If We Gain, Why Not

1987 5 May 6-7 If We Gain, Why Not (792) A short time ago, I happened to meet an Indian leader who publishes an Urdu weekly. For a long time this paper had run at a loss, but later picked up and started making a profit. The history of its phenomenal upswing was interesting to listen to. He told me that when he had launched this enterprise, there seemed to be no way that the circulation could be made to exceed 3,000, and that this was a state of affairs which continued for a long time in spite of his best efforts. Then, in 1985, came the controversy over the Ayodhya mosque (to the Muslims, the Babari Masiid and, to the Hindus the Ram Janam Bhumi). Exploiting this issue to the full, he brought out a spate of sensational articles – most of them sheer bombast – with deliberately provocative captions. As anticipated, his paper’s circulation soared from a mere 3,000 to a spectacular 30,000. Congratulatory letters began to pour in from all sides.

While the Babari Masjid type of dispute is bad news for the Muslim community at large, it is, on the contrary, the best possible news for the leaders of that community, for that is the kind of news which is grist to every political and journalistic mill. It is no exaggeration to say that while, for the general Muslim public, it is a tragedy, for the leaders it is more of a comedy. It would be wrong to think that this applies only to a few stray cases; it applies to entire Muslim leadership and the entire field of Muslim journalism.

The above success story reminded me of a certain Muslim villager who made a habit of visiting graves and Durgahs (saints shrines) to ask for favours, although, strictly speaking, a good Muslim should visit such sites only to pray for the departed souls, the granting of favours being the prerogative of the Almighty. A religious scholar who lived in the vicinity tried to make him see the error of his ways by pointing out that such an act was tantamount to polytheism (Shirk), but the villager’s experience told him otherwise. It seems that whatever he had asked for at a graveside has been granted to him – even the birth of a male child. The advice of the scholar, therefore, made no sense to him, and he countered with: “if I benefit from going there, why should not I go?”

For the past twenty years, the writer has been advising Muslim leaders to eschew emotionalism in politics and to adopt a quiet constructive approach. To this end I have had meetings with the more prominent of the Muslim leaders, entered into correspondence with them, focused attention on this issue through my writings and tried in every way possible to elucidate this point so fully that they would be left with no arguments against my point of view. Yet no Muslim leader is willing to accept this advice. It is because they are no different from the villager by the graveside. Each Muslim leader in his heart of heart thinks: “why not dabble in emotionalism? It is to my advantage.”

It is a stark reality that what gives the greatest boost to both Muslim leadership and journalism is rioting. If communal riots were to cease in this country, we should see an end to their dominating influence.

According to Sajid Rashid, an Urdu journalist of considerable experience, “The most popular topic of the majority of Urdu newspapers is ‘riots’ and that, too, only Hindu-Muslim riots. The Urdu papers now find it inconceivable that a new issue should be published without some such sensational item. This is a matter of personal experience. The youthful editor of a weekly paper actually expressed such a desire to me. ‘If only there could be a riot – the circulation of my paper would increase.’

“Most of the Urdu journalists are victims of this selfsame disease. Pick up any Muslim weekly and you will be confronted with such a picture of victimization and persecution as would persuade you that there is no community more persecuted and more pitiable than the Muslims.

“There can be no two opinions about the fact that Muslims are fuel to the fire of communalism in this country. But the way this is presented by Muslim journalists is having an adverse effect on Muslim morale, hence their sense of insecurity and persecution. A feeling of this kind so undermines the spirit of self-reliance and power of decision-making that many in the Muslim world have begun to suffer from a kind of mental paralysis. We have to realize that, wittingly or unwittingly, most of the Urdu papers are engaged in the dangerous ploy of incapacitating the entire community.”

(Urdu Times, Bombay, 14 September, 1986).