Clearing the Path for Islam
Al-Risala (English), May 1990, p. 8
By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan is named as the default author of the periodical; a piece that carries another writer’s byline is credited to that writer.
Clearing the Path for Islam
1990 5 May 8 Clearing the Path for Islam (591) Patrick Ryan writes that extraordinary success in the propagation of Islam was achieved “by learning to live lives of submission to God and to His messenger in a pluralistic, sometimes even unsympathetic environment. What eventually contributed to that environment changing to a ‘realm of Islam’ (Dar al-Islam) was not the militancy of the Muslim minority but the religious interest of the non-Muslim majority in what they came to recognize as a peaceful and attractive form of faith.”1
It has been generally accepted that the dissemination of Islam on an international scale in later centuries was achieved mainly through traders and sufis. This does not, however, mean that these Muslim traders or sufis were engaged in dawah work in an organized fashion. There is no record, in fact, in the history of Islam, of there having been any regular, organized activity on their part which could be interpreted as a missionary struggle.
It being a historical fact, however, that Islam did spread through the traders and sufis, the question then arises as to the reason for the vastness of scale on which this dissemination took place. The reason is not far to seek. In those days the widespread phenomenon we now recognize as the ‘politics of protest’ had not yet come into being. Today, this policy, adopted by Muslims in one way or another in almost every corner of the world, is – if we could but realize it – the greatest obstacle to the spread of Islam.
The reason is that this brand of ‘protest politics’ causes tension and strife between da’i and mad’u. And Islam simply cannot be communicated in such an atmosphere of tension and antagonism.
The revolution that marked the first era of Islam, bringing a great history into being, grew in size until Islam itself became a veritable flood: now Islam had been invested with tremendous power to spread on its own. The meaningless politics of hatred of our present-day Muslim leaders have, on the contrary, acted as a deterrent to the flood of Islam. Remove this obstacle and Islam will go on spreading on its own.
We need, in this day and age, to understand and appreciate what exactly was achieved by the traders and sufis of old, and how exactly they accomplished this. In effect, they did nothing more difficult or complicated than lead simple, quiet lives and refrain from causing friction in any other community. It was this frictionless co-existence which removed the barriers from the sweep of Islam’s great floodwaters. Given such ideal conditions, Islam spread unceasingly on its own. Our present-day Muslim leaders are the first group in Islamic history who, by their meaningless activities in the name of Islam, have brought its dissemination to a complete standstill by placing the obstacles of hatred and prejudice in its path.
1. Islam and Politics in West Africa: Minority and Majority Models, Quoted by the Muslim World, January 1987, p.6
The same spirit, with which the traders and sufis of old were imbued, needs to be reborn among the Muslims of today. That is, they must follow the path of adjustment and not confrontation, a policy which, as Patrick Ryan has rightly observed, made possible the wide dissemination of Islam in the past.
Confrontations between Muslims and other nations take place mostly on issues of a political, economic and social nature. If, on such occasions, Muslims adopt an attitude of intransigence, this can only result in da’i and mad’u being constantly at loggerheads, with the ultimate cessation of any spread of Islamic influence among other nations.
