Criticize constructively – A void unjust accusation
Al-Risala (English), July-August 1996, p. 15
By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan is named as the default author of the periodical; a piece that carries another writer’s byline is credited to that writer.
Criticize constructively – A void unjust accusation
1996 7-8 July-August 15 Criticize constructively – A void unjust accusation (143) ‘Abdullah, son of ‘Umar ibn Khattab, completely disassociated himself from the civil wars which followed upon the assassination of ‘Ali. When his contemporaries accused him of not participating in the jihad he explained his stance by asking, “How can it be permissible for one muslim to spill the blood of another?” He also maintained that he did not consider this war a jihad, but murder and bloodshed among Muslims. His antagonists, dissatisfied with this explanation, continued to level accusations at ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, saying that his real motive was to let the companions of the Prophet kill each other off, so that when only he remained, finally, people would swear their allegiance to him as Commander of the Faithful. All these accusations were made in spite of the fact that’ Abdullah ibn ‘Umar’ s sincerity, piety and acumen were well established. (Abu Nu’aym)

‹ Previous page Next page › About this issue Open in the reader