Spirit of Islam · ARGUMENTS AGAINST GOD AND RELIGION — Part III Argument from History

ARGUMENTS AGAINST GOD AND RELIGION — Part III Argument from History

Spirit of Islam, Mar 2015, p. 16

By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan

Maulana Wahiduddin Khan is named as the default author of the periodical; a piece that carries another writer’s byline is credited to that writer.

contrary, the picture of reality which forms in consonance with an antireligious philosophy is completely out of step with the human mind. On this point, J.W.N. Sullivan has made a very pertinent quotation from Bertrand Russell: That man is the product of such causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noon-day brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system. And that the whole temple of man’s achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins. All these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand. When religious concepts find a harmonious echo in the human psyche, it is a proof that this was the reality which human nature was in search of. This extract sums up the irreligious, materialistic school of thought. According to such thinking, our prospects in life are darkened by gloom and despair. The materialistic interpretation of life also dispenses with any definite criterion for the judgement of good and evil. It justifies the dropping of bombs on human beings, the use of flame-throwers and chemical warfare, to name but a few of the scourges of modern times. This is not considered outrageous, tyrannical or bestially aggressive. After all, human beings have to die one way or another. Religious thought, by contrast, affords a glowing ray of hope, giving to both life and death a joyous and meaningful radiance. In this way it fulfils our psychological needs. When a scientist propounds a theory, which is found to conform to a mathematical formula, he is convinced that what he has discovered is a reality. Similarly, when religious concepts find a harmonious echo in the human psyche, this is a proof that this was the reality which human nature was in search of. It gives us such a sense of fulfilment that we are left with no real grounds for denying its truth. To quote the words of Earl Chester Rex, an American mathematician: I use the accepted principle in science which governs the choice between two or more conflicting theories. According to this

The printed page

‹ Previous page Next page › About this issue Open in the reader

Printed page