TOWARDS GLOBAL PEACE

Makkah, he avoided a battle altogether by making a rapid entry into the city with ten thousand Muslims—a number large enough to awe his enemies into submission. In this way, on all occasions, the Prophet endeavoured to achieve his objectives by peaceful rather than by war-like means. It is, therefore, unconscionable that in later biographical writing, all the events of his life have been arranged under the heading of ‘battles’. How he managed to avert the cataclysms of war has not been dealt with in any of the works, which purportedly depict his life. Ibn Khaldun, the celebrated 14th century historian, was the first to lay down definite rules for the study and writing of history and sociology. He followed the revolutionary course of attempting to present history as a chronicle of events centering on the common man rather than on kings, their generals and the battles they fought. But since the heroes of war were already entrenched as the idols of society, the caravan of writers and historians continued to follow the same well-worn path as had been trodden prior to Ibn Khaldun. When people have come to regard war heroes as the greatest of men, it is but natural that it is the events of the battlefield, which will be given the greatest prominence in works of history. All other events will either be relegated to the background or omitted altogether. In the later phase of Islam, there came into existence a powerful group of Sufis (mystics)— many of them great men, who exerted their influence on a multitude of people, their goal being to put an end to this contradiction between the tenets of Islam and Muslim conduct. They at least wanted to strike a balance between the two. But the Sufis failed in this, the principal reason being that they expressed themselves in terms of dreams and inspirations. The militant interpretation of Islam, on the contrary, was ostensibly based on history and knowledge. Dreams and personal realizations could, therefore, never adequately counter what had come to be regarded as hard fact. Objective reasoning cannot be overcome by subjective postulations, and so the Sufis failed to establish the equilibrium between precept and practice, which they so ardently desired. In the past when the sword was the only weapon of war, militancy did not lead to the mass-scale loss of life and property as modern The Prophet always opted for avoidance of conflict. In fact, he is the first historical figure to employ peaceful methods to resolve differences.