THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MAN
Spirit of Islam, September-october 2023, p. 32
By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan is named as the default author of the periodical; a piece that carries another writer’s byline is credited to that writer.
THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MAN Historical Proof The Prophet faced adversity with the determination to wring success out of failure. “ There is no more astonishing career in history than that of the founder of this religion (Islam) and scarcely any man has more profoundly influenced the destinies of the world. He was, of course, favoured by circumstances, but he knew how to turn them to his purposes, and he faced adversity with the determination to wring success out of failure. While he could not have succeeded in another place or at another time, it is tolerably certain that no one could have succeeded at all.” E.E. Kellet, A Short History of Religions (London, 1933) p. 333 “He was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels.” Dr Michael H. Hart, The 100, New York, 1978 The people who opposed the message of the Prophet of Islam were so ingrained in hostility that they left no stone unturned to uproot not just the message but also the messenger and his adherents. Beset by extreme adverse circumstances, it seemed highly unlikely that the message would survive. Despite this, his message spread far and wide and found acceptance in every corner of the world. This success has no parallel in human history. This extraordinary conquest was achieved by him through special divine help. God has thus provided a historical example to show people that, finally, only those will succeed who follow the true, divine path. Those who tread other paths, shall be left in a state of despair and dejection in the world of God in the life to come. o ? If you encounter any issue regarding the presentation of content on the Spirit of Islam website (www.spiritofislam.co.in), please mail in your suggestions or questions to usman_888@yahoo.com.

‹ Previous page Next page › About this issue Open in the reader