A COMPARISON

delivered to us by him. Those who still stray from the path of righteousness will bear sole responsibility for their misguidance. (Shahadat-e-Haq) At first glance, this interpretation of Shahadat-eHaq (testimony to the truth) seems quite appealing. However, forgive me for saying that it is not only poetic but also places a significant accusation on God and all His Prophets. If Shahadat-e-Haq is truly as defined here, then it suggests that no Prophet has genuinely fulfilled the duty of testimony. This interpretation claims that for the “complete” fulfillment of testimony, it is necessary to practice the entire religion and demonstrate full adherence to all commands and guidance, from personal life to collective matters, including international issues outlined in God’s Shariah. In this sense, none of the known Prophets (may peace be upon them all) have ever provided complete testimony to their people. Conversely, we see in the Quran that during the early stages of invitation, when the people of truth are still oppressed and only verbally conveying their message, disbelievers are warned that if they continue to deny, they will deserve punishment (Quran, 11:3). Now, if fully practicing the entire religion is essential for the completion of testimony and proof, then this early warning loses its meaning.